Here's a first-go at a table briefly outlining some of the distinctions between the teachings of mind only (cittamatra) and consciousness only (vijnaptimatra).
I have observed that in Tibetan Buddhism the distinctions seem to have been lost or never established when Buddha Dharma came from India to Tibet, and so the Tibetan system usually employs consciousness only and mind only interchangeably without distinction.
Zen Buddhism is in the lineage of the Indian ancestral master Bodhidharma who brought the "One Vehicle lineage of Southern India" to China with his manner of teaching the Lankavatara Sutra. Therefore, at different times Zen has been called the "Mind Only School" and the "Buddha Mind School" because the mind only tradition of the One Vehicle takes mind as Buddha.
Differences Between Consciousness Only And Mind Only.
consciousness only
|
mind only
|
|
Sanskrit
|
vijñaptimatra (etym.
divided-knowing-getting-only; lit. representation-only, information-only, or
cognition-only); vijñānamatra (etym. divided-knowingness-only;
lit., consciousness-only) D.T. Suzuki clarifies that vijñaptimatra
is the proper technical term used by Vasubhandu, but confusion has caused vijnanamatra to be the commonly used
label consciousness-only. Vasubhandu said, “So long as consciousness (vijnana) does not abide in a state of
cognition-only/representation-only (vijnaptimatratva),
there is no ceasing of the remorse of the two-fold grasping (i.e., dualism).”
|
cittamatra (etym.
that which perceives-only, that which comprehends-only, that which reflects
upon-only; lit. mind-only); cittadṛśyamātra (lit. mind-seen-only)
|
Chinese
|
唯識
|
唯心
|
school or teaching lineage
|
Yogacara (the Practice of
|
Ekayana (the One Vehicle)
|
central idea
|
everything we become aware of is
nothing but the representations of consciousness; the world is the
objectification of consciousness.
|
everything that manifests is nothing but mind; the world
is the objectification of mind
|
what is mind?
|
mind (as manas)
includes the 6, 7, & 8 consciousnesses
|
mind (as citta)
includes all 8 consciousnesses
|
relation between mind and consciousness
|
mind (manas) is
an aspect of consciousness
|
consciousness is an aspect of mind (citta)
|
alayavijnana’s purity or impuity
|
alayavijnana is purity itself with nothing defiled in it
(as the most profound depth of mind). Ignorance only arises as a function of
the 1-7th consciousnesses.
|
alayavijnana contains the seeds of the pure and the impure
and is the impurity phase of the undefiled Tathagatagarba which contains both
good and not-good roots, while the essence of mind (citta) is pure (in the
sense of transcending both purity and impurity) in its most profound
Dharmakaya aspect which is the original nature of both TG and AV. Ignorance arises as a function of the
alayvijnana.
|
the successive depths of mind
|
mano-vijnana, manas, alayavijnana
|
mano-vijnana,
manas, alayavijnana, Tathagatagarbha, Dharmakaya (AV, TG, and DK are three names
for 3 aspects of the one and same. “the
Tathagatagarbha
is the Alayavijnana”)
|
tathagatagarba (TG)
|
sees TG as too close to atman/eternal self/ego substance
and as contrary to teaching of anatman
|
sees TG as how consciousness perceives Dharmakaya and as how
Dharmakaya transforms into alayavijnana
|
process orientation
|
emphasizes the process of transformation which takes place
in the alayavijnana to realize that
consciousness is only representational activity
|
emphasizes the process of transformation that takes place
in the alayavijnana to realize that
consciousness is only mind’s activity and so mind becomes Buddha
|
relations between the 1-7 consciousnesses and the 8th
alayavijnana
|
the 1st to 8th consciousnesses are
distinguished functions of consciousness.
|
The 1st to 7th consciousnesses are
the activity of the 8th alayavijnana as the waves are the activity
of the ocean.
|
No comments:
Post a Comment